Cost-effectiveness of a Novel Hypoglycaemia Programme: The 'HARPdoc vs BGAT' RCT

Diabet Med. 2024 Jun;41(6):e15304. doi: 10.1111/dme.15304. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Abstract

Aims: To assess the cost-effectiveness of HARPdoc (Hypoglycaemia Awareness Restoration Programme for adults with type 1 diabetes and problematic hypoglycaemia despite optimised care), focussed upon cognitions and motivation, versus BGAT (Blood Glucose Awareness Training), focussed on behaviours and education, as adjunctive treatments for treatment-resistant problematic hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes, in a randomised controlled trial.

Methods: Eligible adults were randomised to either intervention. Quality of life (QoL, measured using EQ-5D-5L); cost of utilisation of health services (using the adult services utilization schedule, AD-SUS) and of programme implementation and curriculum delivery were measured. A cost-utility analysis was undertaken using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as a measure of trial participant outcome and cost-effectiveness was evaluated with reference to the incremental net benefit (INB) of HARPdoc compared to BGAT.

Results: Over 24 months mean total cost per participant was £194 lower for HARPdoc compared to BGAT (95% CI: -£2498 to £1942). HARPdoc was associated with a mean incremental gain of 0.067 QALYs/participant over 24 months post-randomisation: an equivalent gain of 24 days in full health. The mean INB of HARPdoc compared to BGAT over 24 months was positive: £1521/participant, indicating comparative cost-effectiveness, with an 85% probability of correctly inferring an INB > 0.

Conclusions: Addressing health cognitions in people with treatment-resistant hypoglycaemia achieved cost-effectiveness compared to an alternative approach through improved QoL and reduced need for medical services, including hospital admissions. Compared to BGAT, HARPdoc offers a cost-effective adjunct to educational and technological solutions for problematic hypoglycaemia.

Keywords: cost‐effectiveness; health economics; hypoglycaemia; quality of life; randomised controlled trial; service utilization; type 1 diabetes.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Glucose / metabolism
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1* / economics
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1* / therapy
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemia* / economics
  • Hypoglycemia* / therapy
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / economics
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Education as Topic / economics
  • Quality of Life*
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years*

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Hypoglycemic Agents