Quality and Patient Safety Metrics: Developing a Structured Program for Improving Patient Care in the Department of Medicine at The Ottawa Hospital

Acad Med. 2024 Jul 1;99(7):736-740. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005693. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

Abstract

Problem: Despite increasing recognition of the importance of quality and patient safety in academic medicine, challenges remain with ensuring physician participation in quality assurance and quality improvement efforts, such as lack of compensation and enabling resources. An organizational culture that includes physician leadership and a supportive infrastructure is needed to encourage physician backing of quality and patient safety initiatives.

Approach: The authors describe the development of a robust quality and patient safety program in the Department of Medicine at The Ottawa Hospital over the past 7 years and highlight how the department changed its organizational culture by prioritizing quality and patient safety and establishing the necessary infrastructure to support this program. Program development was characterized by 4 overarching themes: incentives, administrative structure and physician leadership, training and support, and system enhancements.

Outcomes: As a result of the program, the department broadly implemented a standardized framework for conducting quality committee meetings and morbidity and mortality rounds and reviewing patient safety incidents and patient experience across its 16 divisions. This has led to 100% departmental compliance on corporate quality assurance metrics each year (e.g., regular multidisciplinary divisional quality committee meetings), along with physician participation in formal quality improvement initiatives that align with larger corporate goals.

Next steps: The authors reflect on lessons learned during the implementation of the program and the essential elements that contributed to its success. Next steps for the program include using a centralized repository of quality and patient safety data, including patient safety incident dashboards, to encourage greater divisional collaboration on quality improvement initiatives and continuous institutional learning over time. Another important avenue will be to create an academic hub for excellence in quality and a formal approach to reward and promote physicians for their quality work.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Leadership
  • Ontario
  • Organizational Culture*
  • Patient Safety* / standards
  • Program Development / methods
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care
  • Quality Improvement* / organization & administration