Intraoperative Use of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump to Generate Pulsatile Flow During Heart Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

ASAIO J. 2024 Oct 1;70(10):848-852. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002199. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

Abstract

The physiologic impact of pulsatile flow (PF) on end-organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is controversial. Using an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) to maintain PF during CPB for patients undergoing heart transplantation (HT) may impact end-organ perfusion, with implications for postoperative outcomes. A single-center retrospective study of 76 patients bridged to HT with IABP was conducted between January 2018 and December 2022. Beginning in May 2022, patients received IABP-generated PF during CPB at an internal rate of 80 beats/minute. Fifty-eight patients underwent HT with the IABP turned off (IABP-Off), whereas 18 patients underwent HT with IABP-generated PF (IABP-On). The unmatched IABP-On group experienced shorter organ ischemia times (180 vs . 203 minutes, p = 0.015) and CPB times (104 vs . 116 minutes, p = 0.022). The cohort was propensity matched according to age, organ ischemia time, and CPB time. Elevations in postoperative lactates in the immediate (2.8 vs . 1.5, p = 0.062) and 24 hour (4.7 vs . 2.4, p = 0.084) postoperative periods trended toward significance in the matched IABP-Off group. There was no difference in postoperative vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), postoperative creatinine, or length of stay. This limited preliminary data suggest that maintaining counterpulsation to generate PF during CPB may improve end-organ perfusion in this patient population as suggested by lower postoperative lactate levels.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cardiopulmonary Bypass / methods
  • Female
  • Heart Transplantation* / methods
  • Humans
  • Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping* / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pulsatile Flow* / physiology
  • Retrospective Studies