Sex differences in osteosarcoma survival across the age spectrum: A National Cancer Database analysis (2004-2016)

Lindsay A Williams; Sofia Barragan; Zhanni Lu; Brenda J Weigel; Logan G Spector

doi:10.1016/j.canep.2024.102565

Sex differences in osteosarcoma survival across the age spectrum: A National Cancer Database analysis (2004-2016)

Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Oct:92:102565. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102565. Epub 2024 Apr 4.

Authors

Lindsay A Williams¹, Sofia Barragan², Zhanni Lu², Brenda J Weigel³, Logan G Spector⁴

Affiliations

¹ Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address: lawilliams@umn.edu.
² Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
³ Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
⁴ Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

PMID: 38575425
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102565

Abstract

Background: Osteosarcoma displays a bimodal peak in incidence in adolescence and later adulthood. Males are more frequently diagnosed with osteosarcoma in both periods. Males have worse survival than females, which is generally poor at 30-70% 5-years post diagnosis, depending on age, but treatment received is often unaccounted for in survival analyses.

Methods: Therefore, we estimated sex differences in survival for children and adults stratifying by treatment received and other disease characteristics using the National Cancer Database (2004-2016, n=9017). We estimated sex differences in long-term survival using Kaplan Meier survival curves and Log-Rank p-values. We also estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the measure of association between sex and death using Cox regression.

Results: In all age groups, cases were predominantly male (52-58%). In Kaplan-Meier analyses, males had worse overall survival than females for 0-19, 20-39, and ≥60-year-olds (Log-Rank p<0.05). Females had higher 5- and 10-year survival percentages in all age groups. In adjusted Cox models, males had a higher risk of death among 0-19-year-olds (HR_overall: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.44; HR_{non-metastatic disease}: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.63, HR_{lower limb tumors}: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09-1.59). Among 20-39-year-olds, males had an increased risk of death when receiving surgery only (HR: 4.67, 95% CI: 1.44, 15.09). Among those ≥60-year-olds, males had a suggestive increased risk of death overall (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.99-1.39) and a higher risk of death based on some tumor locations, (HR_{upper limb}: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.24, 5.11; HR_midline: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.82).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the worse survival among young males compared to females with osteosarcoma persisted after accounting for many major disease characteristics, including treatment received. Collectively, our work points toward other unexplored mechanisms beyond treatment, potentially biologic or otherwise, which may be driving the observed sex differences in long-term survival.

Keywords: Childhood and adult cancer; Osteosarcoma; Sex differences; Survival.

MeSH terms

Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Bone Neoplasms* / epidemiology
Bone Neoplasms* / mortality
Bone Neoplasms* / pathology
Child
Child, Preschool
Databases, Factual*
Female
Humans
Incidence
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Osteosarcoma* / epidemiology
Osteosarcoma* / mortality
Osteosarcoma* / pathology
Sex Factors
Survival Rate
United States / epidemiology
Young Adult