Prognostic Impact of Left Atrial Appendage Patency After Device Closure

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May;17(5):e013579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013579. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

Abstract

Background: The prognostic impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) patency, including those with and without visible peri-device leak (PDL), post-LAA closure in patients with atrial fibrillation, remains elusive.

Methods: Patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with the WATCHMAN 2.5 device were prospectively enrolled. The device surveillance by cardiac computed tomography angiography was performed at 3 months post-procedure. Adverse events, including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and the combined major adverse events (MAEs), were compared between patients with complete closure and LAA patency.

Results: Among 519 patients with cardiac computed tomography angiography surveillance at 3 months post-LAA closure, 271 (52.2%) showed complete closure, and LAA patency was detected in 248 (47.8%) patients, including 196 (37.8%) with visible PDL and 52 (10.0%) without visible PDL. During a median of 1193 (787-1543) days follow-up, the presence of LAA patency was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (adjusted hazard ratio for baseline differences, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.17-8.83]; P=0.023) and MAEs (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.17]; P=0.003). Specifically, LAA patency with visible PDL was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (hazard ratio, 3.66 [95% CI, 1.29-10.42]; P=0.015) and MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.71 [95% CI, 1.71-8.07]; P=0.001), although LAA patency without visible PDL showed higher risks of MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.59 [95% CI, 1.28-10.09]; P=0.015). Incidences of stroke/TIA (2.8% versus 3.0% versus 6.7% versus 22.2%; P=0.010), cardiovascular death (0.9% versus 0% versus 1.7% versus 11.1%; P=0.005), and MAEs (4.6% versus 9.0% versus 11.7% versus 22.2%; P=0.017) increased with larger PDL (0, >0 to ≤3, >3 to ≤5, or >5 mm). Older age and discontinuing antiplatelet therapy at 6 months were independent predictors of stroke/TIA and MAEs in patients with LAA patency.

Conclusions: LAA patency detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography at 3 months post-LAA closure is associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with WATCHMAN 2.5 device.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03788941.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cardiac computed tomography angiography; incomplete device endothelialization; left atrial appendage closure; peri-device leak.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Atrial Appendage* / diagnostic imaging
  • Atrial Appendage* / physiopathology
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / diagnosis
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / diagnostic imaging
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / mortality
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / physiopathology
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / therapy
  • Cardiac Catheterization* / adverse effects
  • Cardiac Catheterization* / instrumentation
  • Computed Tomography Angiography*
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage
  • Humans
  • Ischemic Attack, Transient* / etiology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke* / etiology
  • Stroke* / mortality
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03788941