Evaluation of mechanical properties of an original and a replica-like reciprocating instruments

Aust Endod J. 2024 Dec;50(3):486-492. doi: 10.1111/aej.12854. Epub 2024 May 15.

Abstract

This study assessed the mechanical properties of the Only One File Blue and the Reciproc Blue instruments. A total of 80 new 25 mm reciprocating NiTi instruments (25/.08v) were evaluated for their mechanical performance (n = 40 per group). Cyclic fatigue resistance, torsional fatigue, flexural resistance and buckling resistance tests were conducted. Statistical analysis was employed with a significance level set at 5%. The results indicated no statistically significant differences in resistance to cyclic fatigue neither in the fragment length between the instruments (p > 0.05). However, the Reciproc Blue instrument exhibited greater torque to fracture and a larger rotation angle than the Only One File Blue instrument (p < 0.05). The Only One File Blue instrument demonstrated higher flexibility but lower resistance to buckling compared to the Reciproc Blue instrument (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the tested instruments exhibit differences in mechanical properties, with the Reciproc Blue instrument generally presenting greater advantages than the Only One File Blue.

Keywords: endodontics; fracture resistance; materials testing; reciprocating system; torsional resistance.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Dental Alloys / chemistry
  • Dental Instruments
  • Dental Stress Analysis
  • Equipment Design*
  • Equipment Failure
  • Flexural Strength
  • Humans
  • Materials Testing*
  • Nickel* / chemistry
  • Pliability
  • Root Canal Preparation / instrumentation
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Titanium / chemistry
  • Torque
  • Torsion, Mechanical

Substances

  • Nickel
  • titanium nickelide
  • Titanium
  • Dental Alloys