Health system strengthening in fragile and conflict-affected states: A review of systematic reviews

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0305234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305234. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Globally, there is growing attention towards health system strengthening, and the importance of quality in health systems. However, fragile and conflict-affected states present particular challenges. The aim of this study was to explore health system strengthening in fragile and conflict-affected states by synthesising the evidence from published literature.

Methods: We conducted a review of systematic reviews (Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022371955) by searching Ovid (Medline, Embase, and Global Health), Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Only English-language publications were considered. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool was employed to assess methodological quality of the included studies. The findings were narratively synthesised and presented in line with the Lancet's 'high-quality health system framework'.

Results: Twenty-seven systematic reviews, out of 2,704 identified records, considered key dimensions of health systems in fragile and conflict-affected states, with the 'foundations' domain having most evidence. Significant challenges to health system strengthening, including the flight of human capital due to safety concerns and difficult working conditions, as well as limited training capacities and resources, were identified. Facilitators included community involvement, support systems and innovative financing mechanisms. The importance of coordinated and integrated responses tailored to the context and stage of the crisis situation was emphasised in order to strengthen fragile health systems. Overall, health system strengthening initiatives included policies encouraging the return and integration of displaced healthcare workers, building local healthcare workers capacity, strengthening education and training, integrating healthcare services, trust-building, supportive supervision, and e-Health utilisation.

Conclusion: The emerging body of evidence on health system strengthening in fragile and conflict-affected states highlights its complexity. The findings underscore the significance of adopting a comprehensive approach and engaging various stakeholders in a coordinated manner considering the stage and context of the situation.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Armed Conflicts
  • Delivery of Health Care*
  • Global Health
  • Humans

Grants and funding

BB is funded by the King’s College London ‘Africa International PGR Scholarships 2021-22’ (URL: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/study-legacy/funding/africa-international-pgr-scholarships) to support her study ‘Dental and Health Sciences Research MPhil/PhD’. JEG and SS are salaried by King’s College London. However, there is no funding specific to this research paper.