Lower Associated Risk of Revision With All-Polyethylene Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry

J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jan;40(1):80-83. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.060. Epub 2024 Jun 27.

Abstract

Background: Despite the potential advantage of all-polyethylene tibial components, modular metal-backed component use predominates the market in the United States for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is partially driven by concerns about the associated revision risk due to the lack of modularity with all-polyethylene components. This study utilized the American Joint Replacement Registry to compare the associated risk of all-cause revision and revision for infection for all-polyethylene versus modular metal-backed tibial components.

Methods: An analysis of primary TKA cases in patients aged 65 years and older was performed with American Joint Replacement Registry data linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2012 to 2019. Analyses compared all-polyethylene to modular metal-backed tibial components. We identified 485,024 primary TKA cases, consisting of 479,465 (98.9%) metal-backed and 5,559 (1.1%) all-polyethylene. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses created hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate the association of design and the risk of all-cause revision while adjusting for sex, age, and the competing risk of mortality. Event-free survival curves evaluate time to revision.

Results: The all-polyethylene tibia group demonstrated a decreased risk for all-cause revision (HR = 0.37; 95% confidence interval: 0.24 to 0.55; P < .0001) and revision for infection (HR = 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.22 to 0.77, P < .0001). Event-free survival curves demonstrated a decreased risk of all-cause revision that persisted across time points until 8 years post-TKA.

Conclusions: In the United States, all-polyethylene tibial component use for TKA remains low compared to modular metal-backed designs. A decreased associated risk for revision should ease concerns about the use of all-polyethylene components in patients aged 65 years or older, and future investigations should investigate the potential cost and value savings associated with expanded use in this population.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

Keywords: American Joint Replacement Registry; Arthroplasty Registry; all-polyethylene tibia; revision; total knee arthroplasty.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee* / instrumentation
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Prosthesis*
  • Male
  • Polyethylene*
  • Prosthesis Design*
  • Prosthesis Failure*
  • Registries*
  • Reoperation* / statistics & numerical data
  • Tibia / surgery
  • United States

Substances

  • Polyethylene