Self-Collection for HPV Testing: Potential Issues Related to Performance Measures and Quality Improvement Among Federally Qualified Health Centers

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024 Sep-Oct;30(5):688-700. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001913. Epub 2024 Jul 22.

Abstract

Context: Most incident cases of cervical cancer in the United States are attributable to inadequate screening. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) serve a large proportion of women who are low-income, have no insurance, and are underserved-risk factors for insufficient cervical cancer screening. FQHCs must maintain quality measures to preserve their accreditation, address financial reimbursements, and provide quality care. Implementation of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection can improve cervical cancer screening coverage within FQHCs.

Objectives: To understand perspectives from clinical personnel on current cervical cancer screening rates at FQHCs in North Carolina and the impact of implementing HPV self-collection among underscreened patients on screening rates and performance measures.

Design: The study used focus groups and key informant interviews. Coding-based thematic analysis was applied to both focus group and interview transcripts. Emergent themes regarding perspectives on self-collection implementation were mapped onto Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs to identify future barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Setting: Two FQHCs in North Carolina and a cloud-based videoconferencing platform.

Participants: Six FQHCs in North Carolina; 45 clinical and administrative staff from the 6 FQHCs; 1 chief executive officer (n = 6), 1 senior-level administrator (n = 6), 1 chief medical officer (n = 6), and 1 clinical data manager (n = 6) from each FQHC.

Main outcome measure: Achievement of clinical perspectives.

Results: Societal-, practice-, and patient-level factors currently contribute to subpar cervical cancer screening rates. HPV self-collection was expected to improve screening uptake among underscreened women at FQHCs, and thus quality and performance measures, by offering an alternative screening approach for in-clinic or at-home use. Implementation barriers include financial uncertainties and HPV self-collection not yet a Food and Drug Administration-approved test.

Conclusion: HPV self-collection has potential to improve cervical cancer screening quality and performance measures of FQHCs. For a successful implementation, multilevel factors that are currently affecting low screening uptake need to be addressed. Furthermore, the financial implications of implementation and approval of HPV self-collection as a test for cervical cancer screening quality measures need to be resolved.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Early Detection of Cancer* / methods
  • Female
  • Focus Groups*
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / methods
  • Mass Screening / standards
  • Middle Aged
  • North Carolina
  • Papillomaviridae / isolation & purification
  • Papillomaviridae / pathogenicity
  • Papillomavirus Infections* / diagnosis
  • Qualitative Research
  • Quality Improvement*
  • Specimen Handling / methods
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / prevention & control