Purpose: Our aim was to assess the ability of simultaneous immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for p16 and p53 to accurately subclassify head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) as HPV-associated (HPV-A) versus HPV-independent (HPV-I) and compare p53 IHC staining patterns to TP53 mutation status, p16 IHC positivity and HPV status.
Methods: We stained 31 HNSCCs for p53 and p16, and performed next-generation sequencing (FoundationOne©CDx) on all cases and HPV in-situ hybridization (ISH) when sufficient tissue was available (n = 23). p53 IHC staining patterns were assessed as wildtype (wt) or abnormal (abn) patterns i.e. overexpression, null or cytoplasmic staining.
Results: In a majority of cases (28/31) interpretation of p16 and p53 IHC was straightforward; 10 were considered HPV-A (p16+/p53wt) and 18 cases were HPV-I (p16-/p53abn). In the remaining three tumours the unusual immunophenotype was resolved by molecular testing, specifically (i) subclonal p16 staining and wild type p53 staining in a tumour positive for HPV and with no TP53 mutation (HPV-A), (ii) negative p16 and wild type p53 staining with a TP53 mutation and negative for HPV (HPV-I), and (iii) equivocally increased p16 staining with mutant pattern p53 expression, negative HPV ISH and with a TP53 mutation (HPV-I).
Conclusion: Performing p16 and p53 IHC staining simultaneously allows classification of most HNSCC as HPV-A (p16 +, p53 wild type (especially basal sparing or null-like HPV associated staining patterns, which were completely specific for HPV-A SCC) or HPV-I (p16 -, p53 mutant pattern expression), with the potential for limiting additional molecular HPV or mutational testing to selected cases only.
Keywords: HPV-associated; HPV-independent; Head and neck SCC; p16; p53.
© 2024. The Author(s).