Moral injury: An unspoken burden of transplant surgery

Abstract

Moral injury in health care is characterized as the lasting psychological, biological, and social impact on providers that occurs following an adverse patient outcome. Moral injury can contribute to second victim syndrome and lasting psychological harm. Although many surgeons face moral injury due to patient acuity and the potential for intraoperative or postoperative complications, the transplant ecosystem compounds the impact of moral injury. Institutional blame placed on the transplant surgeon following a posttransplant death or graft loss is magnified by public reporting. Centers whose outcomes fall below threshold levels are subject to regulatory citation and financial loss. Moral injury can also result in risk aversion, limiting access to transplants for higher-risk candidates and reducing acceptance of marginal organs hurting donor families. Strategies to increase resilience, reduce accusation and blame, and focus on system quality improvement are vital to mitigate the impact of moral injury on transplant professionals. The transplant community must proactively work to reduce moral injury to protect surgeons, ensure access to life-saving transplant procedures, and avoid unnecessary organ offer declines.

Keywords: moral injury; organ transplant surgery; regulation; second victim syndrome.