Objective: Explore how anatomical measurements and field modeling can be leveraged to improve investigations of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) effects on both motor and non-motor TMS targets.
Methods: TMS motor effects (targeting the primary motor cortex [M1]) were evaluated using the resting motor threshold (rMT), while TMS non-motor effects (targeting the superior temporal gyrus [STG]) were assessed using a pain memory task. Anatomical measurements included scalp-cortex distance (SCD) and cortical thickness (CT), whereas field modeling encompassed the magnitude of the electric field (E) induced by TMS.
Results: Anatomical measurements and field modeling values differed significantly between M1 and STG. For TMS motor effects, rMT was correlated with SCD, CT, and E values at M1 (p < 0.05). No correlations were found between these metrics for the STG and TMS non-motor effects (pain memory; all p-values > 0.05).
Conclusion: Although anatomical measurements and field modeling are closely related to TMS motor effects, their relationship to non-motor effects - such as pain memory - appear to be much more tenuous and complex, highlighting the need for further advancement in our use of TMS and virtual lesion paradigms.
Keywords: Anatomy; Cortical thickness; Field modeling; Scalp-cortex distance; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Virtual lesion.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.