Fusion versus decompression alone for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: a target trial emulation with index trial benchmarking

Eur Spine J. 2024 Nov;33(11):4281-4291. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08495-0. Epub 2024 Sep 21.

Abstract

Purpose: The value of adding fusion to decompression surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal canal stenosis remains debated. Therefore, the comparative effectiveness and selected healthcare resource utilization of patients undergoing decompression with or without fusion surgery at 3 years follow-up was assessed.

Methods: Using observational data from the Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study and a target trial emulation with index trial benchmarking approach, our study assessed the comparative effectiveness of the two main surgical interventions for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis-fusion and decompression alone in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal canal stenosis. The primary outcome-measure was change in health-related quality of life (EuroQol Health Related Quality of Life 5-Dimension 3-Level questionnaire [EQ-5D-3L]); secondary outcome measures were change in back/leg pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale), change in satisfaction (Spinal Stenosis Measure satisfaction subscale), physical therapy and oral analgesic use (healthcare utilization).

Results: 153 patients underwent decompression alone and 62 had decompression plus fusion. After inverse probability weighting, 137 patients were included in the decompression alone group (mean age, 73.9 [7.5] years; 77 female [56%]) and 36 in the decompression plus fusion group (mean age, 70.1 [6.7] years; 18 female [50%]). Our findings were compatible with no standardized mean differences in EQ-5D-3L summary index change score at 3 years (EQ-5D-3L German: 0.07 [95% confidence interval (CI), - 0.25 to 0.39]; EQ-5D-3L French: 0.18 [95% CI, - 0.14 to 0.50]). No between-group differences in change in back/leg pain intensity or satisfaction were found. Decompression plus fusion was associated with greater physical therapy utilization at 3 years follow-up.

Conclusion: Decompression alone should be considered the primary option for patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

Keywords: Comparative effectiveness; Decompression; Fusion surgery; Healthcare resource utilization; Index trial benchmarking; Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis; Spinal canal stenosis; Target trial emulation.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Benchmarking
  • Decompression, Surgical* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lumbar Vertebrae* / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life
  • Spinal Fusion* / methods
  • Spinal Stenosis* / surgery
  • Spondylolisthesis* / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome