' I am happy to be listened to': co-creation of a simple tool to measure women's experiences of respectful maternity care in urban Tanzania

Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2403972. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2403972. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

Abstract

Background: Rights-based Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) is crucial for quality of care and improved birth outcomes, yet RMC measurements are rarely included in facility improvement initiatives. We aimed to (i) co-create a routine RMC measurement tool (RMC-T) for congested maternity units in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and (ii) assess the RMC-T's acceptability among women and healthcare stakeholders.

Method: We employed a participatory approach utilizing multiple mixed methods. This included a scoping review, stakeholder engagement involving postnatal women, healthcare providers, health leadership, and global researchers through interviews, focus groups, and two surveys involving 201 and 838 postnatal women. Cronbach's alpha and factor analysis were conducted for validation using Stata 15. Theories of social practice and Thematic Framework of Acceptability guided the assessment of stakeholder priorities and tool acceptability.

Results: The multi-phased iterative co-creation process produced the 25-question RMC-T that measures satisfaction, communication, mistreatment (including physical, verbal, and sexual abuse; neglect; discrimination; lack of privacy; unconsented care; post-birth clean-up; informal payments; and denial of care), supportive care (such as food intake and mobility), birth companionship, post-procedure pain relief, bed-sharing, and newborn respect. The pragmatic validation process prioritized stakeholder feedback over strict statistics, lowering Cronbach's alpha from 0.70 in version 1 to 0.57 for the RMC-T. Women valued the opportunity to share their experiences.

Conclusions: The RMC-T is contextualized, validated, and acceptable for measuring women's experiences of RMC. Routine use in facility-based quality improvement initiatives, along with targeted actions to address gaps, will advance rights-based RMC. Further validation and community-based studies are needed.

Keywords: Dar es Salaam; Person-centered maternity care; disrespect and abuse; experience of care; measurement tool; mistreatment; respectful maternity care; urban health.

Plain language summary

• Main findings: This study describes the participatory approach involving postnatal women, healthcare providers, health leadership, and global researchers to co-create and validate a tool for measuring women’s experiences of respectful maternity care in Dar es Salaam’s urban health facilities.• Added knowledge: The iterative process produced a concise, 25-item Respectful Maternity Care Measurement tool that is user-friendly, administered in 15–20 minutes and addresses all mistreatment domains. The tool reflects women’s priorities and is well accepted by postnatal women and health leaders.• Global health impact for policy and action: Regular use of the tool can enhance awareness of childbirth rights and drive actions to improve and normalize respectful maternity care in low-resource urban settings.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Maternal Health Services* / organization & administration
  • Maternal Health Services* / standards
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pregnancy
  • Quality of Health Care / organization & administration
  • Respect*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Tanzania

Grants and funding

This work is a collaborative effort between CCBRT, the Dar es Salaam Regional health authorities, Aga Khan University, and the PartoMa study, which is funded by the Danida Fellowship center, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark (Danida project 18-08-KU). It was supported by funding from CCBRT through Global Affairs Canada, and additional funds from UNICEF and University Research Co., LLC under the Health Evaluation and Applied Research Development (HEARD project), funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).