Long-Term Outcomes in ICD: All-Causes Mortality and First Appropriate Intervention in Ischemic and Nonischemic Etiologies

Abstract

Real-life data comparing the long-term outcome in patients with different heart diseases carrying an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are scarce. This study aimed to compare the long-term risk of the first appropriate ICD intervention and overall survival in patients with ICD and heart disease of different etiologies. Patients with an ICD implanted between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022, followed in our center were included. Study outcomes were all-cause mortality and first appropriate ICD intervention. A comparison between ischemic heart disease (IHD) and non-IHD (NIHD) was performed. In NIHD different etiologies of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were analyzed. Overall, 1184 patients (592 IDH; 592 NIHD) were included. During a median follow-up of 53 months all-cause death occurred in 399 patients (34%) whereas first appropriate ICD intervention occurred in 320 (27%). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in IHD vs NIHD patients (60% vs 43%; p <0.0001) but no differences in appropriate ICD intervention rate at 10 years (34% vs 40%; p = 0.125) were observed. In patients with NIHD, a higher 10-year mortality rate was found in valvular heart disease, post-radio/chemotherapy DCM (rctDCM), and hypertensive DCM. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, alcoholic DCM, and rctDCM were the least arrhythmic phenotypes in NIHD. Of note, inappropriate interventions in alcoholic DCM and rctDCM were higher than appropriate ones. In conclusion, the rate of ICD-appropriate interventions and mortality is different according to the etiology of heart disease and cardiovascular risk profile; this should be taken into consideration in the prognostic stratification of these patients at the time of implantation.

Keywords: all-cause mortality; appropriate; etiologies; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; inappropriate; nonischemic.