Reduced auditory perception and brain response with quiet TMS coil

Brain Stimul. 2024 Nov-Dec;17(6):1197-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Abstract

Background: Electromagnetic forces in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coils generate a loud clicking sound that produces confounding auditory activation and is potentially hazardous to hearing. To reduce this noise while maintaining stimulation efficiency similar to conventional TMS coils, we previously developed a quiet TMS double containment coil (qTMS-DCC).

Objective: To compare the stimulation strength, perceived loudness, and EEG response between qTMS-DCC and a commercial TMS coil.

Methods: Nine healthy volunteers participated in a within-subject study design. The resting motor thresholds (RMTs) for qTMS-DCC and MagVenture Cool-B65 were measured. Psychoacoustic titration matched the Cool-B65 loudness to qTMS-DCC pulsed at 80, 100, and 120 % RMT. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded for both coils. The psychoacoustic titration and ERPs were acquired with the coils both on and 6 cm off the scalp, the latter isolating the effects of airborne auditory stimulation from body sound and electromagnetic stimulation. The ERP comparisons focused on a centro-frontal region that encompassed peak responses in the global signal while stimulating the primary motor cortex.

Results: RMT did not differ significantly between the coils, with or without the EEG cap on the head. qTMS-DCC was perceived to be substantially quieter than Cool-B65. For example, qTMS-DCC at 100 % coil-specific RMT sounded like Cool-B65 at 34 % RMT. The general ERP waveform and topography were similar between the two coils, as were early-latency components, indicating comparable electromagnetic brain stimulation in the on-scalp condition. qTMS- DCC had a significantly smaller P180 component in both on-scalp and off-scalp conditions, supporting reduced auditory activation.

Conclusions: The stimulation efficiency of qTMS-DCC matched Cool-B65 while having substantially lower perceived loudness and auditory-evoked potentials.

Keywords: Auditory evoked potential; Coil; EEG; Hearing; TMS; TMS-Evoked potential.

MeSH terms

  • Acoustic Stimulation / methods
  • Adult
  • Auditory Perception* / physiology
  • Brain / physiology
  • Electroencephalography* / instrumentation
  • Evoked Potentials / physiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Motor Cortex / physiology
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation* / instrumentation
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation* / methods
  • Young Adult