Introduction: Our goal was to compare outcomes of adrenalectomy performed by low-volume and high-volume academic urologists with extensive experience in renal surgery.
Methods: A single-center retrospective review identified patients undergoing adrenalectomy by urologists from 2009 to 2023. Data were gathered on demographics, tumor characteristics, surgeon volume, surgical outcomes including length of procedure, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and complications identified by the Clavien-Dindo complication classification system. Bivariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for BMI, size of mass, age, and surgical approach compared outcomes between low- and high-volume adrenalectomy surgeons.
Results: A total of 304 adrenalectomies were performed by 7 urologic surgeons during the study period. One surgeon was high volume, with an average of 15 adrenalectomies per year during the study period. The remaining 6 surgeons ranged from < 1 to 4 adrenalectomies per year on average during the study period and were considered low volume. On multivariable analysis, the rate of any complication was found to be significantly different between the groups (5.3% vs 13.5%, P = .01). However, on analysis of Clavien 3 or higher complications, the rate was not found to be different (1% vs 4%, P = .22). Procedure time (130 vs 134 minutes, P = .33), estimated blood loss (30 vs 50 mL, P = .86), positive margin rate (11% vs 7%, P = .35), and length of stay (2 days vs 2 days, P = .22) were not different when the surgery was performed by a high-volume or low-volume urologist.
Conclusions: Surgical volume may not affect outcomes of adrenalectomy when performed by urologists experienced in retroperitoneal surgery at a high-volume, specialized center.
Keywords: adrenal; adrenalectomy; case volume; outcomes.