Importance: Despite guidelines recommending avoidance of benzodiazepine administration to older patients, many of them now receive benzodiazepines as a part of anesthesia care. The effectiveness of clinician- and patient-facing interventions to discourage such use remains insufficiently characterized.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of clinician peer comparison, patient informational mail, or a combination of these interventions compared with usual care on the rate of perioperative benzodiazepine administration to older patients.
Design, setting, and participants: This 2 × 2 factorial, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized clinical trial of a corporate quality improvement initiative was conducted between August 8, 2022, and May 28, 2023, across 415 hospitals, surgery centers, and physician offices in 8 US states served by anesthesia clinicians from a national anesthesia practice. Participants were adults aged 65 years or older who underwent an elective surgical or endoscopic procedure with general anesthesia. Data analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle.
Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups-clinician peer comparison (wherein clinicians received feedback regarding their performance compared with other clinicians in the practice), patient informational mail (wherein patients received an informational letter encouraging them to have a discussion regarding medication selection with their clinician on the day of surgery), both interventions, or usual care (no intervention).
Main outcomes and measures: Rate of benzodiazepine administration during anesthesia care and patient satisfaction with anesthesia care (measured by the Anesthesia Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire, version 2).
Results: Among the 509 269 enrolled participants (255 871 females [50.2%]; mean [SD] age, 74 [7] years), 81 363 (16.0%) were assigned to clinician peer comparison, 98 520 (19.3%) to patient informational mail, 169 712 (33.3%) to both interventions, and 159 674 (31.4%) to usual care. Among patients who received benzodiazepine during anesthesia care, 24.5% were in the usual care group compared with 19.7% in the clinician peer comparison group, 20.0% in the patient informational mail group, and 19.7% in the combination group. After adjustment for time, none of the study interventions were associated with lower odds of benzodiazepine administration compared with usual care (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 [95% CI, 0.98-1.07]; P = .35 for clinician peer comparison; OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.96-1.05]; P = .81 for patient informational mail; and OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.05-1.16]; P < .001 for combined interventions). Satisfaction scores were high in all groups and did not vary by treatment assignment.
Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that clinician peer comparison, patient informational mail, or a combination of both interventions did not reduce benzodiazepine administration to older patients compared with usual care; patient satisfaction remained high throughout the study. Overall, the findings suggest a need to explore other patient-targeted interventions to improve anesthesia care.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05436392.