Working in partnership to reduce re-offending and improve prison leavers' lives: a process evaluation of a prison leaver pilot project

J Offender Rehabil. 2024 Oct 9;63(8):524-544. doi: 10.1080/10509674.2024.2406748. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Prison leavers encounter significant barriers to successfully re-integrating into the community, which can lead to re-offending. Complex interventions which are multi-faceted and involve successful partnerships are needed to meet the distinct health and social needs of this population group. For this study, we conducted a process evaluation of a pilot project, which aimed to offer holistic support to prison leavers through a combination of peer mentoring, sport and physical activity, and signposting, delivered in a community setting. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with individuals (n = 14) involved in the delivery and the management of the project to understand how it had been implemented and what factors had influenced the delivery and partnerships involved. Factors that influenced project delivery included safeguarding and risk assessment concerns, lived experience of peer mentors, accessibility of the intervention, and the role of sport and physical activity as a vehicle for community re-integration. Partnership working was influenced by effective information sharing, organizational commitment, building relationships and professional networks, and regular communication between organizations. An intervention involving peer mentoring, sport and physical activity, and signposting, supported by close partnership working, was viewed as a promising approach to support the community re-integration of prison leavers.

Keywords: peer mentoring; prison; qualitative; re-offending; partnerships; sport.

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC) (Grant Ref: NIHR200182). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.