Transverse versus Vertical Incision in the Surgical Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum

Austin Oberlin; Katherine Yoh; Eve Overton; Whitney A Booker; John G Ilagan; Dib Sassine; Alexandra Diggs; Sherelle Laifer-Narin; Adela Cimic; Laurence E Ring; Maria Sheikh; Caryn St Clair; June Hou; Alexandre Buckley De Meritens; Jason D Wright; Mary D'Alton; Chia-Ling Nhan Chang; Mirella Mourad; Fady Khoury-Collado

doi:10.1055/a-2479-2604

Transverse versus Vertical Incision in the Surgical Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum

Am J Perinatol. 2024 Dec 24. doi: 10.1055/a-2479-2604. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Austin Oberlin¹, Katherine Yoh¹, Eve Overton¹, Whitney A Booker¹, John G Ilagan¹, Dib Sassine¹, Alexandra Diggs¹, Sherelle Laifer-Narin², Adela Cimic³, Laurence E Ring⁴, Maria Sheikh⁴, Caryn St Clair¹, June Hou¹, Alexandre Buckley De Meritens¹, Jason D Wright¹, Mary D'Alton¹, Chia-Ling Nhan Chang¹, Mirella Mourad¹, Fady Khoury-Collado¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
² Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
³ Department of Anatomic Pathology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
⁴ Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, New York.

PMID: 39566520
DOI: 10.1055/a-2479-2604

Abstract

Objectives: Traditionally, midline vertical skin incisions have been utilized during surgery for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), as it is considered to maximize exposure and allow for a uterine incision to avoid the placenta. However, literature directly comparing outcomes of vertical versus transverse incisions in PAS is sparse. Our objective was to compare maternal outcomes between patients who underwent a vertical versus a transverse skin incision for PAS.

Study design: Retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed PAS undergoing scheduled surgery at our institution between September 2019 and November 2023. Starting in October 2021, select patients were offered a transverse skin approach. Patients were eligible if the surgery was scheduled, and the placenta was not entirely covering the anterior uterine wall. The transverse skin incision was approximately 18 to 20 cm and used the patient's prior scar. Primary outcomes included the rate of maternal transfusion >4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs), the incidence of surgical complications, and the need for conversion to general anesthesia (GETA).

Results: Seventy patients underwent scheduled surgery for PAS. Thirty-three patients had a vertical skin incision, and 37 had a transverse incision. After initiation of the transverse incision approach, 37/43 (86%) had a transverse incision and none required conversion to a vertical incision intraoperatively. The two groups were similar with regard to age, body mass index (BMI; kg/m²), and severity of PAS. There was no difference in the rate of transfusion of >4 units of PRBCs (vertical 12% vs. transverse 22%, p = 0.29), or in the rate of intraoperative complications (i.e., cystotomy; vertical 3% vs. transverse 14%, p = 0.20). In patients with a transverse incision, a significantly lower number of patients required conversion to GETA intraoperatively (vertical 70% vs. transverse 24%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In appropriately selected patients, a transverse skin incision was associated with lower conversion to GETA without any difference in intraoperative outcomes.

Key points: · Transverse incision for PAS has equivalent surgical outcomes.. · Fewer patients require GETA with a transverse incision.. · Transverse incision for PAS may need fewer narcotics..