Impact of the Number of Patellar Dislocations on Outcomes of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Dec 13;12(12):23259671241274769. doi: 10.1177/23259671241274769. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Patellar dislocation is a common knee injury and up to 35% of those who dislocate the patella can develop recurrent patellar instability. In the setting of recurrent instability, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is often performed to restore knee stability. There has been recent interest in patient and surgical factors that influence outcomes of MPFL reconstruction. Much of the previous work has focused on influences of anatomic measures; however, patients and injury characteristics may also impact surgical outcomes.

Hypothesis: Patients who experience >2 patellar dislocations before MPFL reconstruction would demonstrate poorer patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared with those with ≤2 previous dislocations.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Records were reviewed to identify patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction at a single institution between 2008 and 2016. Patients who underwent concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy or fixation of an osteochondral fracture were excluded. Patient demographics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]), number of previous patellar dislocations, and patient anatomic measures (Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and trochlear sulcus angle) were collected. PROs were assessed with Norwich Patellar Instability score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Marx activity score. Outcomes of patients with >2 patellar dislocations were compared with those with ≤2 dislocations using multiple linear regression analysis.

Results: Medical record review revealed 160 patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction (71 with ≥2 dislocations and 89 with >2 dislocations); 95 patients (59%) completed PROs at a median follow-up of 4.6 years postoperation (range, 1.0-12.6 years). Patients with ≥2 dislocations were younger (≥2 dislocations: 20.7 ± 7.3 years, >2 dislocations: 28.5 ± 10.0 years; P < .001), although there were no other differences in demographics or radiographic anatomic measures between groups. Adjusting for age, sex, BMI, CDI, TT-TG distance, and trochlear sulcus angle, patients with >2 dislocations had 13.7 points lower KOOS-Pain (P = .003), 8.3 points lower KOOS-Activities of Daily Living (P = .025), 18.2 points lower KOOS-Sports and Recreation (P = .009), and 19.8 points lower KOOS-Knee-Related Quality of Life (P = .008) subscale scores than patients with ≤2 dislocations. No significant differences in KOOS symptoms subscale, Norwich Patellar Instability, or Marx score were noted between groups.

Conclusion: Patients with >2 patellar dislocations before MPFL reconstruction exhibited poorer PROs at a median of 4.8 years postoperation compared with those who had ≤2 dislocations before surgery, when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, CDI, TT-TG distance, and trochlear sulcus angle.

Keywords: MPFL reconstruction; knee; patella; patella tendon.