Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke

Front Neurol. 2024 Nov 29:15:1489296. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1489296. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Perioperative ischemic stroke is a rare but devastating complication. Mechanical thrombectomy is a promising therapeutic method, but very little data is available on its efficacy and safety. This study aims to answer this question by comparing the clinical outcomes of perioperative and community-onset stroke patients after endovascular therapy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on a total of 35 perioperative and 584 community-onset acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy at our hospital over the past 3.5 years. The recanalization rate, clinical recovery and cerebral hemorrhage within 90 days after therapy were compared between these two patient groups.

Results: Endovascular thrombectomy provided perioperative and community-onset ischemic stroke patients with comparable rates of successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b grade) (97.1% vs. 97.3%; p = 0. 967) and favorable functional recovery (mRS ≤ 2) (51.4% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.348), with no increase in severe intracranial hemorrhage (0% vs. 2.6 and 1.0%, for hematoma ≥30% of infarcted tissue and intraventricular hemorrhage, respectively) within 90 days. In addition, perioperative stroke patients had higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (42.9% vs. 26.7%; p = 0.038) and intracranial cerebral artery stenosis without clear embolism (17.1% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.001) than community-onset stroke patients.

Conclusion: Endovascular thrombectomy is an effective and safe therapeutic approach for patients with perioperative ischemic stroke, although the results need to be validated by further studies with larger populations. Atrial fibrillation and large artery stenosis may contribute to the pathogenesis of perioperative ischemic stroke.

Keywords: community-onset stroke; endovascular thrombectomy; intracranial hemorrhage; perioperative stroke; prognosis.

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from Zhejiang Provincial Basic and Public Welfare Research Program (No. LGF21H020005 to Feng Wang); Zhejiang Provincial Medicine and Health Research Foundation (grant number: 2021RC141 to Feng Wang), and Saarland University through Anschubfinazierung 2024 (to Yang Liu).