Perceptions of children and young people in England on the smokefree generation policy: a focus group study

Nathan P Davies; Rachael L Murray; Tessa Langley; Joanne R Morling; Manpreet Bains

doi:10.1093/ntr/ntae300

Perceptions of children and young people in England on the smokefree generation policy: a focus group study

Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Dec 17:ntae300. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae300. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Nathan P Davies¹, Rachael L Murray^{1

2}, Tessa Langley^{1

2}, Joanne R Morling^{1

3}, Manpreet Bains¹

Affiliations

¹ Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, UK.
² SPECTRUM consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
³ NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust with the University of Nottingham, UK.

PMID: 39688186
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae300

Abstract

Background: Modelling shows smokefree generation (SFG) policies could effectively reduce smoking rates by banning tobacco sales to those born after a specific year. Little is known about how young people perceive the legitimacy and impact of the planned SFG policy in England.

Methods: We conducted 7 semi-structured focus groups with 36 participants aged 12 - 21 (mean = 15) in England over video call and in person. 21 participants were female and 15 male. Participants were purposively sampled to include those from areas of greater deprivation and for use of tobacco or e-cigarettes. Data was analysed using the framework approach.

Results: Participants expressed broadly negative perceptions towards tobacco and its manufacturers. Most participants supported SFG policy goals and its focus on freedom from addiction and harm; some believed it should also encompass electronic cigarettes. Many believed the law would only be successful if it included stringent enforcement, accompanying tobacco licensing, and input from young people. A minority raised concerns about the loss of freedom to purchase tobacco.

Conclusions: Communication of the freedom-giving nature of SFG is likely to resonate with many young people. Enforcement, communication, and involvement of young people in SFG should be considered carefully to maximise policy impact.

Implications: The smokefree generation (SFG) policy's potential to offer freedom from addiction and disease can resonate with young people. Its effectiveness could be maximised through targeted enforcement in areas with high youth smoking rates and low adherence to age-of-sale laws, and through introduction of additional policies that offer restrictive licensing of tobacco retailers. A phased approach to SFG, initially covering tobacco and later incorporating e-cigarettes as smoking prevalence declines, could balance reducing youth vaping and harm reduction; future research could investigate optimal policy conditions for this approach.