Objective: To compare the frequency of clinically significant missed injuries in clinically stable trauma patients undergoing initial whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) versus selective imaging. Secondary objectives include comparisons of radiation exposure, incidental findings, ED length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS and mortality.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of trauma activations at a tertiary trauma centre in patients with normal vital signs from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2022. Data were collected from the trauma registry and chart review of medical records.
Results: A total of 665 patients were included with 42% (n = 277) receiving a WBCT, compared to 58% (n = 388) undergoing selective imaging. Most patients (52%) did not have any traumatic axial injuries identified. Missed injuries were identified in 0.8% (n = 3/388) of patients in the selective imaging cohort, with no adverse patient outcomes or major alteration to inpatient management. No missed injuries were identified in the WBCT group. Mortality was rare (0.9%, n = 6/665), occurring exclusively in elderly patients and mostly attributed to non-traumatic pathologies. Patients undergoing WBCT had a significantly increased likelihood of incidental findings (75% vs 35%, P < 0.001), increased radiation exposure (mean 24.67 vs 8.19 millisieverts [mSv], P < 0.001), longer ED LOS (9.86 vs 8.43 h, P = 0.012) and a higher likelihood of admission (65.3% vs 55.7%, P = 0.012).
Conclusions: Missed injuries were rare and without major complications in this clinically stable cohort. The liberal use of WBCT, despite low rates of missed injuries, morbidity and mortality, suggests over-utilisation of WBCT for 'mechanism only' traumas.
Keywords: X‐ray; blunt injury; computed tomography; incidental findings; missed diagnoses; radiation exposure.
© 2024 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.