Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Corpectomy With Iliac Crest Graft and Fusion in Multilevel Degenerative Myelopathy: A Single Center Experience

Claudio A Rivas Palacios; Mario M Barbosa; María A Escobar; Ezequiel Garcia-Ballestas; Camilo García; Salvador M Mattar; Salvador Mattar

doi:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001754

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Corpectomy With Iliac Crest Graft and Fusion in Multilevel Degenerative Myelopathy: A Single Center Experience

Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Jan 6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001754. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Claudio A Rivas Palacios^{1

2

3}, Mario M Barbosa⁴, María A Escobar^{5

6}, Ezequiel Garcia-Ballestas^{3

7}, Camilo García¹, Salvador M Mattar⁸, Salvador Mattar¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Neurosurgery, Misericordia International Clinic, Barranquilla.
² Department of Neurosurgery.
³ Center of Biomedical Research (CIB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cartagena, Cartagena.
⁴ Department of Epidemiology, University of Valle, Cali.
⁵ Faculty of Medicine, Rafael Nuñez University, Cartagena, Colombia.
⁶ Department of Arts and Humanities, International University of Valencia, Spain.
⁷ Latin-American Council of Neurocritical Care (CLaNI).
⁸ Department of Neurosurgery, University El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.

PMID: 39760402
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001754

Abstract

Study design: Cohort retrospective study.

Objective: We evaluated and compared the outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (CDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy with iliac crest graft and fusion (CCF) in patients with ≥3 level degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

Background: Anterior and posterior approaches are widely employed in DCM when compressive elements predominate in the anterior or posterior spinal cord, respectively. Indications for each approach remain controversial in some contexts.

Methods: Following the STROBE statement, a retrospective enrollment from records of patients who underwent anterior CDF and/or CCF between June 2015 and June 2022. Linear mixed models were applied to establish the effects of the type of surgery according to the follow-up time (mo).

Results: In this study, 73 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 21 (28.8%) were included in the CDF group and 52 (71.2%) in the CCF group. Twenty surgeries were performed at 3 cervical levels and 53 at 4 levels. There was an improvement in the NDI and VAS score, with an Odom mean of 1.63±0.67 at 12 months of follow-up, with no differences between CDF and CCF. In the CDF group, it was reported a greater C2-7 Cobb angle at the third month of follow-up. In the CCF group, the C2-7 Cobb angle had a negative correlation with the NDI and VAS scales, and a positive correlation with the mJOA scale. Intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical time, and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in CDF. There were no differences between the 2 groups in medical complications and other radiologic findings.

Conclusion: Surgery for multilevel DCM using an anterior approach with CDF or CCF showed good clinical outcomes without significant differences between the 2 groups, and equivalent results in medical complications and radiologic parameters. The CDF group had better perioperative results and shorter postoperative hospitalization time.