Third generation vs first generation EGFR-TKIs in the first line treatment for EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Wenjie Hu; Yi Qin; Taoming Dong; Xueying Lin; Yuan Chen; Wenxiong Zhang; Tanggui Feng

doi:10.7150/jca.99319

Third generation vs first generation EGFR-TKIs in the first line treatment for EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

J Cancer. 2025 Jan 1;16(3):735-747. doi: 10.7150/jca.99319. eCollection 2025.

Authors

Wenjie Hu¹, Yi Qin¹, Taoming Dong¹, Xueying Lin¹, Yuan Chen¹, Wenxiong Zhang², Tanggui Feng³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Oncology, The Second People's Hospital of Jingdezhen, Jingdezhen, China.
² Department of thoracic surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
³ Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Jingdezhen, Jingdezhen, China.

Abstract

Background: The prevailing belief is that third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (TGET) outperform first-generation EGFR-TKIs (FGET) in managing advanced-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this standpoint lacks substantiation in evidence-based medicine. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of these two categories. Methods: We searched seven databases for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), focusing on primary endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and central nervous system PFS (CNS-PFS). Additional factors considered included treatment responses and AEs. Results: We analyzed 15 studies from 6 RCTs on six third-generation TKIs: Osimertinib, Lazertinib, Furmonertinib, Aumolertinib, Naquotinib, and Befotertinib. TGET showed better efficacy in PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55 [0.41, 0.75]), CNS-PFS (HR: 0.48 [0.35, 0.66]), CNS-objective response rate (CNS-ORR, risk ratio [RR]: 1.40 [1.19, 1.65]), and duration of response (DOR, HR: 0.52 [0.38, 0.72]). Most subgroups confirmed the PFS advantage. With longer survival time, the superiority in PFS, OS, and CNS-PFS of TGETs became more evident. Both groups had similar OS (HR: 0.86), ORR, CNS-DOR, total AEs, and grade 3-5 AEs. However, TGETs had more severe AEs (RR: 1.17 [1.02, 1.35]). Additionally, there were more grade 3-4 cases of diarrhea, decreased platelet count, pulmonary embolism, fatigue, decreased neutrophil count, and rash, and fewer grade 3-4 increases in alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) in the TGET group. The top 5 AEs in the TGET group were diarrhea (36.32%), rash (30.24%), decreased platelet count (29.15%), elevated serum creatinine (23.63%), and decreased white blood cell count (22.02%). Conclusions: Except for Naquotinib, TGETs demonstrate superiority over FGETs in treating EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, showing improved survival and responses. However, the increased incidence of AEs necessitates careful consideration.

Keywords: First-generation; Meta-analysis; Non-small cell lung cancer; Third-generation; Tyrosine kinase inhibitors.