Objective: In this paper, we explore the correlation between performance reporting and the development of inclusive AI solutions for biomedical problems. Our study examines the critical aspects of bias and noise in the context of medical decision support, aiming to provide actionable solutions. Contributions: A key contribution of our work is the recognition that measurement processes introduce noise and bias arising from human data interpretation and selection. We introduce the concept of "noise-bias cascade" to explain their interconnected nature. While current AI models handle noise well, bias remains a significant obstacle in achieving practical performance in these models. Our analysis spans the entire AI development lifecycle, from data collection to model deployment.
Recommendations: To effectively mitigate bias, we assert the need to implement additional measures such as rigorous study design; appropriate statistical analysis; transparent reporting; and diverse research representation. Furthermore, we strongly recommend the integration of uncertainty measures during model deployment to ensure the utmost fairness and inclusivity. These comprehensive recommendations aim to minimize both bias and noise, thereby improving the performance of future medical decision support systems.
Keywords: bias; explainability; inclusive AI; noise; system design; trust.