Rural-urban disparity in survival and use of PCI in patients who develop STEMI while hospitalized for a non-cardiac condition

Ryan Searcy; Rajiv Patel; Peter Drossopoulos; Sameer Arora; George A Stouffer

doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102979

Rural-urban disparity in survival and use of PCI in patients who develop STEMI while hospitalized for a non-cardiac condition

Curr Probl Cardiol. 2025 Jan 10:102979. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102979. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Ryan Searcy¹, Rajiv Patel¹, Peter Drossopoulos¹, Sameer Arora¹, George A Stouffer²

Affiliations

¹ Division of Cardiology and the McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
² Division of Cardiology and the McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: rstouff@med.unc.edu.

PMID: 39800089
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102979

Abstract

Background: The development of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients hospitalized for non-cardiac indications carries a high mortality rate.

Objectives: Determine the impact of rural vs. urban hospital location and hospital percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volumes on clinical outcomes.

Methods: The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database was queried for STEMI claims from 2011 to 2018. The 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area classification scheme was used to stratify hospitals as urban or rural.

Results: 64960 STEMI patients were identified from 231 hospitals with 2880 (4.4%) being classified as inpatient STEMI (IPS). IPS patients were older (73.5 ± 13.3 years vs 64.6 ± 14.2 years; p < .0001) and more frequently female (49.3% vs 33.1%; p < .0001), had more comorbidities, were less likely to receive PCI (13.1% vs 69.4%; p < .0001), and had higher 1-year mortality (59.6% vs 16.4%; p < .0001) than outpatient STEMI (OPS). IPS that occurred in rural hospitals were less often treated with PCI (3.8% vs 13.8%; p < 0.01) and had higher one-year mortality (68.6% vs 58.9%; p < 0.01) than those occurring in urban hospitals. Similar results were observed when hospitals were divided into rural vs suburban vs urban based on the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Patients with IPS admitted to low-volume PCI centers were significantly less likely to receive PCI and had higher one-year mortality, after adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, compared to those admitted to high-volume PCI centers.

Conclusions: IPS treated at rural hospitals and/or low-volume PCI centers were less likely to be treated with PCI and had higher one-year mortality rates.

Unstructured abstract: The development of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in patients hospitalized for non-cardiac indications carries a high mortality rate. Using a large retrospective cohort study, we investigated the impact of hospital location and PCI volume on outcomes in inpatient STEMI (IPS). Patients with IPS were generally older, more frequently female, and had more comorbidities than those with outpatient STEMI. After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, those with IPS admitted to rural and/or low-volume PCI centers were less likely to receive PCI and experienced higher one-year mortality rates.

Keywords: PCI volume; ST-elevation myocardial infarction; hospital location; percutaneous coronary intervention; rural; urban.

Publication types

Review