Risk of residual rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction with the double-stapling technique. Postoperative endoscopic follow-up study

Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Feb;38(2):207-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02052453.

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to assess the risk of retained rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique.

Methods: A total of 113 patients underwent proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal reconstruction. In 57 patients the anastomosis between pouch and proximal anal canal was performed using the double-stapling technique. In 26 patients the procedure was carried out without a protecting ileostomy. Of the remaining 31 patients with a proximal ileostomy, 15 underwent endoscopy six weeks postoperatively. Circular biopsies were taken just distal from the pouch-anal anastomosis.

Results: Histologic examination revealed rectal mucosa in at least one biopsy in 7 of 15 patients. At follow-up (mean 18 months) no (distal) pouchitis was clinically noticed. In one patient with familial polyposis, a few polyps, distal of the anastomosis, had to be endoscopically removed.

Conclusions: Double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has a considerable risk of residual rectal mucosa, because of combined linear transection and circular stapling with bilateral dog-ear formation of rectal mucosa. Residual rectal mucosa did not seem to influence clinical results at follow-up.

MeSH terms

  • Adenomatous Polyposis Coli / pathology
  • Adenomatous Polyposis Coli / surgery*
  • Adult
  • Anastomosis, Surgical
  • Biopsy
  • Colitis, Ulcerative / pathology
  • Colitis, Ulcerative / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intestinal Mucosa / pathology*
  • Male
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative / adverse effects*
  • Proctocolectomy, Restorative / methods
  • Rectum / pathology*
  • Surgical Stapling / adverse effects*
  • Surgical Stapling / methods
  • Treatment Outcome