A technique of measuring the precision of an MR-guided stereotaxic installation using anatomic specimens

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994 Feb;15(2):365-71.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a method for direct measurement, using anatomic specimens, of the precision of MR-guided stereotaxic location and to describe its application to a 1.5-T MR unit with a Leksell stereotaxic frame.

Methods: Small pieces of gelfoam (1 X 1 X 1 mm), soaked in gadopentetate dimeglumine, were stereotaxically introduced into formalin-fixed human heads using a Leksell D (three experiments) or G (nine experiments) stereotaxic frame. The head and the frame were then introduced into a 1.5-T MR unit. The target coordinates (as set on the stereotaxic frame by one investigator) were then compared with the MR-determined stereotaxic coordinates (calculated independently by another investigator). The imprecisions Ex, Ey, and Ez in each direction were defined as the differences between the calculated and the chosen coordinates.

Results: Regarding the three targets studied with the D frame, mean imprecision Ex was 1.08 +/- 0.50 mm (mean +/- SEM), Ey 0.83 +/- 0.58 mm, and Ez 0.75 +/- 0.25 mm. For the nine targets studied with the G frame, Ex was 0.48 +/- 0.17 mm, Ey 0.69 +/- 0.14 mm, and Ez 0.82 +/- 0.13 mm. Statistical analysis of the results showed no significant difference between Ex or Ey and half the size of a pixel, indicating that, in the axial plane, stereotaxic MR precision is limited only by pixel size. A statistically significant difference was observed in the coronal plane between Ez and half the size of a pixel, but it must be stressed that Ez remained smaller than 1 mm.

Conclusion: MR-guided stereotaxic location can be used with confidence for most diagnostic, functional, and therapeutic procedures.

MeSH terms

  • Calibration
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / instrumentation*
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Neurosurgery / instrumentation
  • Reference Values
  • Stereotaxic Techniques / instrumentation*