Abstract
A combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) has been a standard therapy for histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas for over 20 years, but several newer regimens, referred to as second or third generation, have been reported to give improved results in single-centre studies. Positive evidence from randomised trials has been lacking, and the British National Lymphoma Investigation therefore commenced a randomised comparison of CHOP vs a third-generation regimen, PACEBOM, in November 1987. A total of 459 eligible patients were entered into the trial: 226 in the CHOP arm and 233 in the PACEBOM arm. Overall, there was no significant difference in outcome between the two arms of the trial. In patients with stage IV disease there was an apparent improvement in survival for those treated with PACEBOM, but considerable caution must be exercised with such subgroup analysis.
Publication types
-
Clinical Trial
-
Comparative Study
-
Multicenter Study
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
Aged
-
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
-
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
-
Bleomycin / administration & dosage
-
Cyclophosphamide / administration & dosage
-
Doxorubicin / administration & dosage
-
Etoposide / administration & dosage
-
Female
-
Humans
-
Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse / drug therapy
-
Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Immunoblastic / drug therapy
-
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / drug therapy*
-
Male
-
Methotrexate / administration & dosage
-
Middle Aged
-
Neoplasm Staging
-
Prednisolone / administration & dosage
-
Prednisone / administration & dosage
-
Survival Analysis
-
Vincristine / administration & dosage
Substances
-
Bleomycin
-
Vincristine
-
Etoposide
-
Doxorubicin
-
Cyclophosphamide
-
Prednisolone
-
Prednisone
-
Methotrexate
Supplementary concepts
-
CHOP protocol
-
PACE-BOM protocol