Physicians' refusal to provide life-prolonging medical interventions

Clin Perinatol. 1996 Sep;23(3):563-71.

Abstract

The intense and ongoing debate on physicians' right to refuse requested life-prolonging medical interventions highlights one of the emerging problems in modern medicine: the limits, if any, to a patient (or proxy's) claim to requested treatment. How is the physician to respond to requests for treatment believed by the physician to be futile, ineffective, or inappropriate? Three cases, Baby L, the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) baby, and Baby K, help focus the ethical and legal issues in this debate.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anencephaly
  • Dissent and Disputes*
  • Ethics, Medical*
  • Group Processes*
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Medical Futility
  • Moral Obligations
  • Personal Autonomy*
  • Refusal to Treat*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Social Values
  • United States
  • Virginia