Abstract
This prospective study concerning 100 subtraction angiographies of the lower limbs compared two iodine concentrations of iopamidol (300 and 370 mg l/l) and ioxaglate (320 and 350 mg l/l). More pain and movements disturbed the subtraction with iopamidol 370 in comparison with ionic contrast media (p < 0.005). The quality of the contrast was better with ioxaglate 350 (p = 0.05) than with the others. This one appears to be a good compromise for this type of examination.
Publication types
-
Clinical Trial
-
Comparative Study
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
MeSH terms
-
Aged
-
Angiography, Digital Subtraction*
-
Arteritis / diagnostic imaging
-
Contrast Media* / administration & dosage
-
Contrast Media* / adverse effects
-
Female
-
Humans
-
Iopamidol* / administration & dosage
-
Iopamidol* / adverse effects
-
Ioxaglic Acid / administration & dosage
-
Ioxaglic Acid / adverse effects
-
Leg / blood supply*
-
Male
-
Middle Aged
-
Prospective Studies
Substances
-
Contrast Media
-
Iopamidol
-
Ioxaglic Acid