[Comparison between iopamidol and ioxaglate in digital arteriography of the lower limbs]

J Radiol. 1996 Sep;77(9):643-7.
[Article in French]

Abstract

This prospective study concerning 100 subtraction angiographies of the lower limbs compared two iodine concentrations of iopamidol (300 and 370 mg l/l) and ioxaglate (320 and 350 mg l/l). More pain and movements disturbed the subtraction with iopamidol 370 in comparison with ionic contrast media (p < 0.005). The quality of the contrast was better with ioxaglate 350 (p = 0.05) than with the others. This one appears to be a good compromise for this type of examination.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction*
  • Arteritis / diagnostic imaging
  • Contrast Media* / administration & dosage
  • Contrast Media* / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Iopamidol* / administration & dosage
  • Iopamidol* / adverse effects
  • Ioxaglic Acid / administration & dosage
  • Ioxaglic Acid / adverse effects
  • Leg / blood supply*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Iopamidol
  • Ioxaglic Acid