[Uterine leiomyosarcomas: a surprising pathology. Review of the literature. Six case reports]

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1996;25(7):710-5.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical features and laboratory tests which define a population with a high risk of leiomyosarcoma.

Method: A retrospective analysis of 660 hysterectomies performed between 1989 and 1994 was conducted. There were 414 cases of leiomyoma and 6 leiomyosarcomas (1.4%).

Results: The indication for hysterectomy was complication of fibromyomatous uterus in all cases. Diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma was never suspected before surgery and the pathology examination. Complimentary radiotherapy was given in 2 patients among the 6 with leiomyosarcoma. Mean survival was 35 months. There were no cases of recurrence or metastasis. None of the laboratory tests performed provided clues to diagnosis.

Conclusion: Physicians should be aware of possible misdiagnosis of a leiomyosarcoma when proposing medical treatment of uterine fibroma.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy
  • Leiomyoma / pathology*
  • Leiomyoma / surgery
  • Leiomyosarcoma / pathology*
  • Leiomyosarcoma / surgery
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Uterine Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Uterine Neoplasms / surgery