Comparison of combination therapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin versus cyclophosphamide and cisplatin in patients with suboptimal stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Semin Oncol. 1997 Feb;24(1 Suppl 2):S2-13-S2-16.

Abstract

This prospective study compared the combination of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and cisplatin with the standard therapy of cyclophosphamide/cisplatin in women with suboptimal stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. Of the initial 410 women who presented with advanced disease and greater than 1 cm residual masses after initial surgery, 386 met all eligibility criteria and were randomly assigned to receive a regimen of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 delivered over 24 hours. Dosage reductions were permitted in the event of significant toxicity. Among 216 patients with measurable disease, responses were reported in 73% of those receiving cisplatin/paclitaxel and in 60% of those receiving cisplatin/cyclophosphamide. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer (P < .001) in the group treated with cisplatin/paclitaxel, compared with those receiving cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (17.9 v 12.9 months, respectively).

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Cisplatin / administration & dosage
  • Cyclophosphamide / administration & dosage
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / pathology
  • Paclitaxel / administration & dosage*
  • Prospective Studies

Substances

  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Paclitaxel
  • Cisplatin