Bone loss around 2 different types of hip prostheses

J Arthroplasty. 1998 Jun;13(4):422-7. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90008-0.

Abstract

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allows the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) around an uncemented hip prosthesis. The aims of this study were: 1) to determine the reproducibility of periprosthetic BMD measurements; 2) to delineate the time course of bone loss that occurs after insertion of a hip prosthesis; and 3) to compare the bone loss around two different types of hip prosthesis. We studied 20 patients: 11 had Bateman and 9 had porous-coated anatomic prostheses inserted. The mean bone loss in 20 patients between 6 and 52 weeks after surgery was 6%. The greatest loss during this period was 18% and occurred from the proximal medial cortex. We conclude that measurement of periprosthetic bone mass by DXA is a precise technique. Bone loss was rapid in the first 6 months following total hip replacement. There was no difference in the bone loss occurring around the two prostheses studied.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Absorptiometry, Photon
  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Area Under Curve
  • Bone Density*
  • Female
  • Femur / pathology*
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoarthritis / surgery
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Regression Analysis
  • Reproducibility of Results