Frankel S - Search Results

1

Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging.

Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Esserman L, et al. Among authors: frankel s. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):110-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.110. J Clin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10458224

2

Imaging techniques for breast MR imaging.

Hylton NM, Frankel SD. Hylton NM, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1994 Nov;2(4):511-25. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1994. PMID: 7489305 Review.

3

Morphologic criteria for interpreting abnormalities seen at breast MR imaging.

Frankel SD, Sickles EA. Frankel SD, et al. Radiology. 1997 Mar;202(3):633-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.3.9051006. Radiology. 1997. PMID: 9051006 No abstract available.

4

Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Frankel SD, Ominsky SH, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Kerlikowske K, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Dec 2;90(23):1801-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.23.1801. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998. PMID: 9839520

5

Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.

Pearson KL, Sickles EA, Frankel SD, Leung JW. Pearson KL, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Mar;174(3):745-52. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740745. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000. PMID: 10701619

6

Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance.

Frankel SD, Sickles EA, Curpen BN, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB. Frankel SD, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 May;164(5):1107-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717214. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995. PMID: 7717214

7

Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderly.

Faulk RM, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB, Frankel SD. Faulk RM, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. Radiology. 1995 Jan;194(1):193-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997552. Radiology. 1995. PMID: 7997552

8

The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.

Curpen BN, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB, Frankel SD. Curpen BN, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 May;164(5):1099-103. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717212. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995. PMID: 7717212

9

Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging.

Forstner R, Hricak H, Occhipinti KA, Powell CB, Frankel SD, Stern JL. Forstner R, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. Radiology. 1995 Dec;197(3):619-26. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480729. Radiology. 1995. PMID: 7480729

10

Characteristics of magnetic resonance sequences used for imaging silicone gel, saline, and gel-saline implants at low field strengths.

Frankel S, Occhipinti K, Kaufman L, Kramer D, Carlson J, Mineyev M, Friedenthal R. Frankel S, et al. Invest Radiol. 1994 Aug;29(8):781-6. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199408000-00009. Invest Radiol. 1994. PMID: 7960630

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

483 results

Search Page

Filters