Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

44 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).
Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, Easton DF, Eeles RA, Evans DG, Gilbert FJ, Griebsch I, Hoff RJ, Kessar P, Lakhani SR, Moss SM, Nerurkar A, Padhani AR, Pointon LJ, Thompson D, Warren RM; MARIBS study group. Leach MO, et al. Among authors: griebsch i. Lancet. 2005 May 21-27;365(9473):1769-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66481-1. Lancet. 2005. PMID: 15910949
Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.
Griebsch I, Brown J, Boggis C, Dixon A, Dixon M, Easton D, Eeles R, Evans DG, Gilbert FJ, Hawnaur J, Kessar P, Lakhani SR, Moss SM, Nerurkar A, Padhani AR, Pointon LJ, Potterton J, Thompson D, Turnbull LW, Walker LG, Warren R, Leach MO; UK Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Screening (MARIBS) Study Group. Griebsch I, et al. Br J Cancer. 2006 Oct 9;95(7):801-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603356. Br J Cancer. 2006. PMID: 17016484 Free PMC article.
MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis.
Evans DG, Kesavan N, Lim Y, Gadde S, Hurley E, Massat NJ, Maxwell AJ, Ingham S, Eeles R, Leach MO; MARIBS Group; Howell A, Duffy SW. Evans DG, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jun;145(3):663-72. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2931-9. Epub 2014 Apr 1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014. PMID: 24687378
Comparing the clinical and economic effects of clinical examination, pulse oximetry, and echocardiography in newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a probabilistic cost-effectiveness model and value of information analysis.
Griebsch I, Knowles RL, Brown J, Bull C, Wren C, Dezateux CA. Griebsch I, et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Spring;23(2):192-204. doi: 10.1017/S0266462307070304. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007. PMID: 17493305
44 results