Champod C - Search Results

1

The nature of forensic science opinion--a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigations and in court proceedings.

Jackson G, Jones S, Booth G, Champod C, Evett IW. Jackson G, et al. Among authors: champod c. Sci Justice. 2006 Jan-Mar;46(1):33-44. doi: 10.1016/s1355-0306(06)71565-9. Sci Justice. 2006. PMID: 16878783

2

Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2019 - 2022).

Bécue A, Champod C. Bécue A, et al. Among authors: champod c. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Dec 28;6:100304. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100304. eCollection 2023. Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022. PMID: 36636235 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.

3

Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks.

Evett IW, Gill PD, Jackson G, Whitaker J, Champod C. Evett IW, et al. Among authors: champod c. J Forensic Sci. 2002 May;47(3):520-30. J Forensic Sci. 2002. PMID: 12051330

4

Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions.

Champod C, Evett IW, Jackson G. Champod C, et al. Sci Justice. 2004 Jul-Sep;44(3):153-64. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(04)71708-6. Sci Justice. 2004. PMID: 15270454

5

Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T.

Berger CE, Buckleton J, Champod C, Evett IW, Jackson G. Berger CE, et al. Among authors: champod c. Sci Justice. 2011 Jun;51(2):43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 14. Sci Justice. 2011. PMID: 21605824

6

E-learning initiatives in forensic interpretation: report on experiences from current projects and outlook.

Biedermann A, Hicks T, Voisard R, Taroni F, Champod C, Aitken CG, Evett IW. Biedermann A, et al. Among authors: champod c. Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Jul 10;230(1-3):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Nov 1. Forensic Sci Int. 2013. PMID: 23122648

7

Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science.

Champod C. Champod C. Sci Justice. 2014 Mar;54(2):107-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 22. Sci Justice. 2014. PMID: 24630319 No abstract available.

8

Re: perception problems of the verbal scale.

Jackson G, Evett I, Champod C, Buckleton J. Jackson G, et al. Among authors: champod c. Sci Justice. 2014 Mar;54(2):180. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 15. Sci Justice. 2014. PMID: 24630330 No abstract available.

9

On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: response to Fenton et al.

Biedermann A, Hicks T, Taroni F, Champod C, Aitken C. Biedermann A, et al. Among authors: champod c. Sci Justice. 2014 Jul;54(4):316-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 2. Sci Justice. 2014. PMID: 25002051

10

The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

Hicks T, Biedermann A, de Koeijer JA, Taroni F, Champod C, Evett IW. Hicks T, et al. Among authors: champod c. Sci Justice. 2015 Dec;55(6):520-5. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Sci Justice. 2015. PMID: 26654089

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

92 results

Search Page

Filters