Zikmund-Fisher BJ - Search Results

1

Effect of Harm Anchors in Visual Displays of Test Results on Patient Perceptions of Urgency About Near-Normal Values: Experimental Study.

Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Scherer AM, Witteman HO, Solomon JB, Exe NL, Fagerlin A. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 26;20(3):e98. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8889. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 29581088 Free PMC article.

2

"Is 28% good or bad?" Evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions.

Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Med Decis Making. 2004 Mar-Apr;24(2):142-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04263154. Med Decis Making. 2004. PMID: 15090100

3

How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey.

Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. Fagerlin A, et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jun;57(3):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.08.007. Patient Educ Couns. 2005. PMID: 15893211 Clinical Trial.

4

What's time got to do with it? Inattention to duration in interpretation of survival graphs.

Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Risk Anal. 2005 Jun;25(3):589-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00626.x. Risk Anal. 2005. PMID: 16022692 Free article.

5

Cure me even if it kills me: preferences for invasive cancer treatment.

Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. Fagerlin A, et al. Med Decis Making. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6):614-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05282639. Med Decis Making. 2005. PMID: 16282212

6

A matter of perspective: choosing for others differs from choosing for yourself in making treatment decisions.

Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Sarr B, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jun;21(6):618-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00410.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 16808746 Free PMC article.

7

Mortality versus survival graphs: improving temporal consistency in perceptions of treatment effectiveness.

Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.013. Epub 2006 Nov 29. Patient Educ Couns. 2007. PMID: 17137743 Clinical Trial.

8

Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.

Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Derry HA, Smith DM. Fagerlin A, et al. Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):672-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07304449. Epub 2007 Jul 19. Med Decis Making. 2007. PMID: 17641137

9

Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.

Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Smith DM, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):663-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07303824. Epub 2007 Jul 24. Med Decis Making. 2007. PMID: 17652180

10

Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses?

Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Keeton K, Ubel PA. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;197(5):528.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.076. Epub 2007 Sep 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17880902 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

223 results

Search Page

Filters