Li L - Search Results

1

Reporting of abstracts in studies that used routinely collected data for exploring drug treatment effects: a cross-sectional survey.

Liu M, Wang W, Wang M, He Q, Li L, Li G, He L, Zou K, Sun X. Liu M, et al. Among authors: li g, li l. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01482-9. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022. PMID: 34996370 Free PMC article.

2

Improving the quality of reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.

Xu C, Liu TZ, Jia PL, Liu Y, Li L, Cheng LL, Sun X. Xu C, et al. Among authors: li l. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0623-6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 30497389 Free PMC article.

3

Impact of time-varying exposure on estimated effects in observational studies using routinely collected data: protocol for a cross-sectional study.

Wang W, Liu M, Xu J, Li L, Tan J, Guo JJ, Lu K, Li G, Sun X. Wang W, et al. Among authors: li g, li l. BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 4;12(7):e062572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062572. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35788067 Free PMC article.

4

The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist.

Li L, Xu C, Deng K, Zhou X, Liu Z, Busse JW, Ren Y, Zou K, Sun X. Li L, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;105:125-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Sep 29. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 30278212

5

The methodological quality of dose-response meta-analyses needed substantial improvement: a cross-sectional survey and proposed recommendations.

Xu C, Liu Y, Jia PL, Li L, Liu TZ, Cheng LL, Deng K, Borhan ASM, Thabane L, Sun X. Xu C, et al. Among authors: li l. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;107:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 13. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019. PMID: 30445166

6

A systematic survey showed important limitations in the methods for assessing drug safety among systematic reviews.

Li L, Deng K, Busse JW, Zhou X, Xu C, Liu Z, Ren Y, Zou K, Sun X. Li L, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Apr 1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32247024

7

Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions.

Xu C, Li L, Lin L, Chu H, Thabane L, Zou K, Sun X. Xu C, et al. Among authors: li l. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Apr 1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32247025

8

Prognostic factors and prediction models for acute aortic dissection: a systematic review.

Ren Y, Huang S, Li Q, Liu C, Li L, Tan J, Zou K, Sun X. Ren Y, et al. Among authors: li l, li q. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e042435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042435. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33550248 Free PMC article.

9

The use of systematic review evidence to support the development of guidelines for positron emission tomography: a cross-sectional survey.

Li Q, Hou W, Li L, Su M, Ren Y, Wang W, Zou K, Tian R, Sun X. Li Q, et al. Among authors: li l. Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep;31(9):6992-7002. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07756-6. Epub 2021 Mar 8. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33683391

10

Utilization of traditional Chinese medicine in the intensive care unit.

Zhang X, Wang M, Wang W, Li L, Sun X. Zhang X, et al. Among authors: li l. Chin Med. 2021 Aug 23;16(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13020-021-00496-1. Chin Med. 2021. PMID: 34425877 Free PMC article.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

99,979 results

Search Page

Filters