Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1992 2
1993 3
1994 2
1995 2
2001 1
2008 1
2011 1
2013 1
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 3
2019 4
2020 5
2021 5
2022 3
2023 2
2024 1

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

35 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Automated solid phase extraction.
Helle N, Baden M, Petersen K. Helle N, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;747:93-129. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-136-9_5. Methods Mol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21643906 Review.
Comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: An individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis.
Harel D, Wu Y, Levis B, Fan S, Sun Y, Xu M, Rice DB, Boruff J, Markham S, Ioannidis JPA, Takwoingi Y, Patten SB, Ziegelstein RC, Cuijpers P, Gilbody S, Vigod S, Akena D, Benedetti A, Thombs BD; DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration. Harel D, et al. J Affect Disord. 2024 Sep 15;361:674-683. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.033. Epub 2024 Jun 21. J Affect Disord. 2024. PMID: 38908554
Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale compared to Structured Clinical Interview for DSM DIsorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.
Lyubenova A, Neupane D, Levis B, Wu Y, Sun Y, He C, Krishnan A, Bhandari PM, Negeri Z, Imran M, Rice DB, Azar M, Chiovitti MJ, Saadat N, Riehm KE, Boruff JT, Ioannidis JPA, Cuijpers P, Gilbody S, Kloda LA, Patten SB, Shrier I, Ziegelstein RC, Comeau L, Mitchell ND, Tonelli M, Vigod SN, Aceti F, Barnes J, Bavle AD, Beck CT, Bindt C, Boyce PM, Bunevicius A, Chaudron LH, Favez N, Figueiredo B, Garcia-Esteve L, Giardinelli L, Helle N, Howard LM, Kohlhoff J, Kusminskas L, Kozinszky Z, Lelli L, Leonardou AA, Meuti V, Radoš SN, García PN, Pawlby SJ, Quispel C, Robertson-Blackmore E, Rochat TJ, Sharp DJ, Siu BWM, Stein A, Stewart RC, Tadinac M, Tandon SD, Tendais I, Töreki A, Torres-Giménez A, Tran TD, Trevillion K, Turner K, Vega-Dienstmaier JM, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Lyubenova A, et al. Among authors: helle n. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Mar;30(1):e1860. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1860. Epub 2020 Oct 22. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021. PMID: 33089942 Free PMC article.
35 results